Monday, August 20, 2012

Brian Leyden / New York Law Firm Accused of Prima Facie

The prima facie tort doctrine exists on the fringes of tort law as a theory that allows a plaintiff to recover for damage resulting from a defendant's intentional and malicious infliction of harm. 

Under this theory, a court's inquiry focuses on the defendant's motivations and intentions to determine whether liability should be imposed.  Courts have used this general doctrine to establish a separate cause of action, the prima facie tort.  Alternatively, they have used the theory to justify imposing liability under other causes of action by expanding existing torts or by creating new ones. The courts' various approaches to treatment and application of the prima facie tort doctrine arise from different and often incompatible interpretations of the tort's purpose and required elements. 

The prima facie tort is generally defined as the "infliction of intentional harm, resulting in damages, without excuse or justification, by an act or series of acts which would otherwise be lawful."  


The specific applications of this definition vary greatly based on the manner in which courts interpret these elements. These divergencies in interpretation lead courts to apply the prima facie tort in inconsistent ways. The courts' confusion in interpretation has three focal points: defining "otherwise lawful," understanding the role of malice in applying the tort, and incorporating "excuse" or "justification" as grounds for denying liability. 


The destruction of Joel Leyden's home, an action defended by New York Law Firm in direct conflict
with a Trust that they authored and represent, will be addressed in a 10 million dollar lawsuit.


Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Michael Martinez SEO

Internet records illustrate that Brian Leyden is paying Michael Martinez to use negative SEO to defame his brother.


Michael Martinez is quilty of criminal harassment, cyberstalking, libel and slander.
Both the local police and the FBI have been contacted.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

New York Law Firm Sues Beneficiary of Trust Over Online Postings About Firm

New York Law firm has described the eviction, destruction of  Joel Leyden's home as "frivolous".


New York Law Journal ^ | July 7, 2012 | Christine Simmons 

New York Law Firm has brought a lawsuit against a client's son whom the firm claims is attempting to defame the firm through online postings.

New York Law Firm claims that Joel Leyden has "illegally appropriated" the law firm's name by registering a website with a domain name nearly identical to its own and posting fictitious news articles on other sites claiming the firm is accused of malpractice and has taken $80,000 in legal fees from a trust account.

One of Joel's postings says the firm bullies and coerces like a mobster.

"There is no malpractice and no case of malpractice," the firm says in New York Law Firm v. Leyden.  "It is not plaintiff but Joel who is depleting the Trust by his repeated frivolous proceedings."

Herbert Rubin, a founding member of the law firm, said in an interview that he has never dealt with a situation like this.

"We felt we had no alternative but to bring this action," in order to stop the attacks on the trustee and the firm, Rubin said.

New York Law Firm, a 60-attorney firm with a wide range of practice areas, such as litigation, real estate and trusts and estates, is seeking an injunction barring any material on any domain names that refer to the firm and requiring that Joel turn over "the illicit domain names." The firm is also asking for $1 million in damages for defamation, domain name cybersquatting and misappropriation of name and tortious interference.

Meanwhile, Joel, who is not yet represented in the New York Law Firm suit, claimed in an interview that the litigation is a form of "pure intimidation" and his online postings are protected speech.

He said New York Law Firm was trying to intimidate him because it does not want to be criticized.

"There is no slander, there is no libel, there is no mistruth. New York Law Firm is trying to censor this," he said.

The dispute stems from Herzfeld's representation of Leyden's father, Bernard Leyden. The firm prepared a will for Bernard, who died in January 2009, which designated Bernard's other son, Brian Leyden, as the trustee of a trust for Joel.

The firm says it represented Brian in his capacity as executor of the estate and as trustee, but has never represented Joel.

About two years ago, Joel left Israel for the United States, contacted Brian and requested payments from the trust. After Brian determined these were unwarranted requests, Joel brought separate proceedings in Manhattan Surrogate Court to obtain money from the trust, the lawsuit says.

Joel most recently filed an action in the Bronx Supreme Court against his brother "repeating the same issues which were rejected" in the Surrogate Court, New York Law Firm suit says. Joel's attorney in the Bronx case, Michael Lippman, said in an interview that Joel is seeking $25,000 from the trust for child support and another $14,000 for living expenses.

The parties are awaiting the court's decision, he said.

The firm says its professional reputation and status have been damaged. Prospective clients have been diverted "to the illicit domain names," and "have been deterred from entering into relations with plaintiff," the suit claims.

The firm says that before it filed suit, it demanded that Joel "desist from posting false and derogatory information, and either discontinue the illicit domain names or transfer same to plaintiff."

A May 5 posting on the news website titled "Israel News Agency" says an Israeli-American, called "Daniel," has accused New York Law Firm of malpractice.

"Instead of acting to ensure my well-being and protection as the Trust stipulates, in accordance to the wishes of my late father, [Herzfeld & Rubin has] chosen to fight me, and are depleting my Trust to fund the brutal and unnecessary legal battles they are waging against me and my children in the New York Courts," the May 5 posting says.

Joel said in an interview that he is speaking to attorneys and preparing a malpractice suit.

His online biography also says he has years of experience in international public relations, public affairs, journalism, social media and Internet marketing. The biography says he has served as a media consultant for several Israeli government offices and U.S. politicians.

Joel, in an interview, said he is 59 and will not have access to the trust until he turns 65.

"I haven't seen the [law firm's] lawsuit but it doesn't surprise me because this New York Law firm has been acting more like a bunch of thugs than like civilized attorneys. And attorneys hired, retained by my father, to protect me [and my family]—something they have completely failed to do," Joel said.

"Anybody can buy any domain name they wish," he said. "Everything we have done has been done in good faith. It has been done under what is known as Fair Use and me and my attorney will not be intimidated by New York Law firm."

Joel said he is facing a number of problems, including a lack of financial resources. He said he may soon live in a shelter, even though, he added, the trust provides for his well being.
He is currently living with friends in New York, he said.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Brian Leyden - Abusive, Negligent, Destructive

Brian   Leyden


Brian Leyden, who serves as Trustee to his brother's Trust, defied the Trust that states that it was created for his brother's "well-being" and "protection" and allowed his brother's home in Israel to be destroyed following an eviction.

Is this "well-being" and "protection"?




“A brother may not be a friend,  but a friend will always be a brother.”

— Benjamin Franklin

Tuesday, May 15, 2012


Brian Leyden Spends Thousands Keeping Children Poor



Spends his brother's money to prevent his brother's

children from having food, clothes and medical.


  • Trustee to provide for "well-being" and "protection" has home destroyed.
  • Trustee to provide for "well-being" and "protection" refuses to pay for heart medicine.
  • Trustee to provide for "well-being" and "protection" separates a loving father from his children.
  • Trustee to provide for "well-being" and "protection" pays law firm Herzfeld & Rubin $80,000 from my Trust to prevent my children getting money for food and clothes - from seeing doctors!
  • Trustee to provide for "well-being" and "protection" lies - commits perjury in New York State Court.




    In an attempt to hide emergencies and human suffering from the Supreme Court of New York that Bernard Leyden's son and grandchildren face in Israel, Herzfeld & Rubin have described the separation of Bernard Leyden's son from his children, the eviction and destruction of his home, urgent appeals for heart medicine and the litigating of over 80,000 dollars in legal fees taken by Herzfeld & Rubin to create such hardships as "frivolous". 

    Such callous indifference and the blatant misleading of the court and legal counsel with reference to a Trust for which Herzfeld & Rubin authored and content which is protected by Fair Use is now being heard by the Supreme Court of New York. 






Fair Use Notice

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Sunday, May 6, 2012

New York Law Firm Calls Request for Heart Medicine, Eviction from Home "Frivolous"

New York Law Firm Calls Request for Heart Medicine, Eviction from Home "Frivolous"
Can you trust this New York Law Firm?

New York --- April 7, 2012 ... A New York Law firm sells themselves as "a full service international law firm, headquartered in New York, focusing on products liability, tort and commercial litigation as well as transactional work."

My father, before he died, retained this New York Law firm to write up and create a Trust for my children and myself. The purpose of the Trust, as written by this New York Law firm, was to provide for my "well being", "protection" and to be there in the event of any "emergencies".

Today, I have been separated from my children for over a year and a half as a result of Herzfeld & Rubin fighting against my and my children's best interest and welfare in New York Courts.

Today, I have been evicted from the only home I have as a result of this New York Law firm fighting against my welfare in New York Courts.



Today, this New York Law firm has taken over $80,000 in legal fees from my Trust in preventing me from being with my children, allowing an eviction from my home to take place (my home was totally destroyed) and taking the position that I could go to prison for child support payments that I could not make due to underemployment.

How does New York Law firm address these issues?

Rather than provide counsel to my brother who acts as Trustee to find healthy solutions and compromises, they march off to Court where they know they can find blank checks from my Trust to support their lavish meals and vacations.

Rather than negotiate settlements out of court with my attorneys - their method of operation is to intimidate my legal counsel by threatening them with sanctions!

If my father knew that over $80,000 of his hard earned money went to Herzfeld & Rubin to hurt me, separate me from my children, his grandchildren, to have me evicted from my home and rather than protect me and care for my well being, he would be writing this consumer complaint.

New York Law Firm can always try to blame my brother for the decisions that they make. But that holds no water as they could have resigned from representing my brother and my Trust. But then again, if they had resigned, they would not be in a position today to take over $80,000 in legal fees as I and my children suffer.

The solution here is filing complaints against New York Law firm with the New York State Bar Association and getting this tragic story out to the New York Times, Daily News, New York Post, AP and Reuters.

Don't allow this New York Law firm to steal your Trust money and intimidate you and your legal counsel.


Fair Use Notice

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Can You Trust This New York Law Firm?


Can You Trust This New York Law Firm?


New York --- A New York Law Firm sells themselves as "a full service international law firm, headquartered in New York, focusing on products liability, tort and commercial litigation as well as transactional work."

My father, before he died, retained Herzfeld & Rubin to write up and create a Trust for my children and myself. The purpose of the Trust, as written by Herzfeld & Rubin, was to provide for my "well being", "protection" and to be there in the event of any "emergencies".

Today, I have been separated from my children for over a year and a half as a result of Herzfeld & Rubin fighting against my and my children's best interest and welfare in New York Courts.

Today, I have been evicted from the only home I have as a result of Herzfeld & Rubin fighting against my welfare in New York Courts.

Today, Herzfeld & Rubin has taken over $80,000 in legal fees from my Trust in preventing me from being with my children, allowing an eviction from my home to take place (my home was totally destroyed) and taking the position that I could go to prison for child support payments that I could not make due to underemployment.

How does Herzfeld & Rubin address these issues?

Rather than provide counsel to my brother who acts as Trustee to find healthy solutions and compromises, they march off to Court where they know they can find blank checks from my Trust to support their lavish meals and vacations.

Rather than negotiate settlements out of court with my attorneys - their method of operation is to intimidate my legal counsel by threatening them with sanctions!

If my father knew that over $80,000 of his hard earned money went to Herzfeld & Rubin to hurt me, separate me from my children, his grandchildren, to have me evicted from my home and rather than protect me and care for my well being, he would be writing this consumer complaint.

Herzfeld & Rubin can always try to blame my brother for the decisions that they make. But that holds no water as they could have resigned from representing my brother and my Trust. But then again, if they had resigned, they would not be in a position today to take over $80,000 in legal fees as I and my children suffer.

The solution here is filing complaints against Herzfeld & Rubin with the New York State Bar Association and getting this tragic story out to the New York Times, Daily News, New York Post, AP and Reuters.

Don't allow Herzfeld & Rubin to steal your Trust money and intimidate you and your legal counsel.



Fair Use Notice

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.